DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S, COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1,007
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
CRS
pear Ci
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant .to the provisions of title 10 of the
United States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 1? October 2013. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Boarg. Documentary material. considered py the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies.
after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. - ,
The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 1 duly 1982.
On 17 February 1984 you received nonjudicial punishment for
wrongful use of cocaine. :
On 5 March 1984 your commanding officer recommended that you be
separated with a discharge under other than honorable conditions
by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse. After review by the
discharge authority, the recommendation for separation was
approved and on 20 March 1984 you were separated with a
discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of
misconduct due to drug abuse.
In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed
all potentially mitigating factors, guch as your youth, overail
record of service, and the unsubstantiated contention that you
were innocent of using cocaine. The Board concluded that these
factors were insufficient to warrant upgrade of your discharge,
aivan vour uee of illegal drugs. Accordingly, your application
Se a af = Rae
has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the
panel will be furnished upon request.
Tt is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board, In this regard, it 1s important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
consedhently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
_ fo
ROBERT D. LMAN
Acting Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR0648 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 October 2013. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official haval record, the burden is on the applicant: to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 10259-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval’ Records, sitting in executive session, considered ‘your application on 6 July 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. During this period you also admitted to using marijuana on two occasions, but stated that you would not use any drugs while serving in the Navy.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 04122-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 January 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. On 8 June 1985, the separation authority approved the discharge recommendation and directed a general discharge by reason of misconduct due...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 01929-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.On 17 August 1982, you enlisted in the Navy at age 19. In connection with this processing, you...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06952-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 May 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 14 May 1984, administrative discharge action was initiated to separate you by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05240-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 March 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 08039-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 July 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all | material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the .
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09978-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 February 2009. You were also counseled regarding this offense and warned that further infractions could result in disciplinary action or an other than honorable (OTH) discharge. On 8 January 1985, you had NJP for use of marijuana.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 10129-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 June 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with ali material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 22 September 1986, you again received NUP for wrongful use of cocaine.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01318-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 Juiy 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all Material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Shortly thereafter, on 10 January 1985, you were notified of pending administrative separation action by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse.